​

M.S. Grineva

 

​

TYPES OF DIALOGUE IN THERAPEUTIC DISCOURSE

​

FSBEI  HI “Kaluga state university named after K.E. Tsiolkovsky”, Kaluga

​

Full Article: PDF  Open Access

​

Language: Russian

 

Citation: 

Grineva M.S. (2016) TYPES OF DIALOGUE IN THERAPEUTIC DISCOURSE. Current issues of linguistics and didactics: conceptions and perspectives: The Proceedings of  the 6-th International Scientific and Practical Conference, April 30 – May 15, 2016, Volgograd, Russia, pp. 56-65.

​

​

Pages: 56-65

 

Published: 16.09.2016

​

Abstract: The article focuses on dialogical interaction in the professional institutional context as viewed from the linguistic argumentology perspective. Argumentation is conceptually different from explanation and informing. This paper is an attempt to reveal the peculiarities of an argumentative situation in therapeutic context. Various approaches to dialogue within different schools of the argumentation theory (informal logic, pragma-dialectics, formal dialectics) are analyzed.

 

Key words: argumentative discourse, argumentative dialogue, argumentative situation, professional linguistic personality, therapeutic discourse.

​

REFERENCES

​

1. Beleckij S.B., Kulikova L.V. Diskurs paternalistskih otnoshenij v lingvisticheskom aspekte / S.B. Beleckij, L.V. Kulikova // Mir nauki, kul'tury i obrazovanija. Gorno-Altajsk, 2012. № 2 (33). S. 247 – 251.

2. Bushev A.B., Zin'kovskij A.K., Agkaceva M.G. Psihoterapevticheskaja ritorika: Monografija / A.B. Bushev, A.K. Zin'kovskij, M.G. Agkaceva. Tver', 2013. 256 s.

3. Vasil'ev L.G. Aspekty argumentacii: materialy po obshhemu jazykoznaniju / L.G. Vasil'ev. Tver', 1992. 56 s.

4. Vasil'ev L.G. Lingvisticheskie aspekty ponimanija: dis. ... dokt. fi-lol. nauk: 10.02.21 / L.G. Vasil'ev. Kaluga, 1999. 251 s.

5. Dem'jankov V.Z. Konvencii, pravila i strategii obshhenija: (Interpretirujushhij podhod k argumentacii) // Izv. AN SSSR. Ser. literatury i jazyka. 1982. T. 41. № 4. S. 327 – 337.

6. Lisanjuk E.N. Logiko-kognitivnaja teorija argumentacii: dis. ... d. filosofskih nauk: 09.00.07 / E.N. Lisanjuk. SPb, 2015. 297 s.

7. Bigi S. Can argumentation skills become a therapeutic resource? Results from an observational study in diabetes care // Scrutinizing argumentation in practice ed. by F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2015. P. 281 – 294.

8. Eemeren F.H. van, Garssen B., Krabbe E.C.W., Snoek Henkemans A.F., Verheij, Wagemans J.H.M. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. 988 p.

9. Eemeren F.H. van, Houtlosser P., Ihnen C., Lewiński M. Contextual considerations in the evaluation of argumentation // Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation: An examination of Douglas Walton’s theories of reasoning and argument ed. by C. Reed & C.W. Tindale. London: College Publications, 2010. P. 115 – 132.

10. Govier T. A Practical study of argument. Enhanced edition, 7th Edition. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2014. 432 p.

11. Hamblin C.L. Fallacies. London: Methuen, 1970. 380 p.

12. Walton D.N. Dialog theory for critical argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2007. 307 p.

13. Walton D.N. The New dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press, 1998. 304 p.

 

Sources

1. Counseling and Psychotherapy Transcripts: Volume II. Alexander Street Press, 2014. URL: http://search.alexanderstreet.com/wayf?destination=ctrn (data obrashhenija 28.09.15)

​